Darby Lumber Company v. United States (1941) - Revision history

Admin: Admin moved page Darby Lumber Company v. United States to Darby Lumber Company v. United States (1941)

2019-10-18T09:02:10Z

Admin moved page Darby Lumber Company v. United States to Darby Lumber Company v. United States (1941)

Admin at 19:04, 13 August 2018

2018-08-13T19:04:14Z

Admin at 01:31, 4 July 2018

2018-07-04T01:31:42Z

Morgannoel18 at 08:18, 22 October 2017

2017-10-22T08:18:20Z

Admin at 15:42, 28 September 2017

2017-09-28T15:42:57Z

Nicole: Created page with "In ''Darby Lumber Company v. United States'' (1941), the U.S. Supreme Court sustained the constitutionality of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which set minimum w..."

2017-01-24T17:04:39Z

Created page with "In ''Darby Lumber Company v. United States'' (1941), the U.S. Supreme Court sustained the constitutionality of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which set minimum w..."

New page

In ''Darby Lumber Company v. United States'' (1941), the U.S. Supreme Court sustained the constitutionality of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which set minimum wages and other working conditions for employees in all businesses (including manufacturing) engaged in interstate commerce. In its decision, the Court explicitly overruled ''Hammer v. Dagenhart'' (1918) and dismissed arguments that the FLSA invaded powers reserved to the states by the Tenth Amendment, referring to that amendment as “but a truism.”

==== Ellis Katz ====

SEE ALSO: [[Hammer v. Dagenhart]]; [[Tenth Amendment]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:04, 13 August 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	In ''Darby Lumber Company v. United States'' (1941), the [[Supreme Court of the United States\|U.S. Supreme Court]] sustained the constitutionality of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which set minimum wages and other working conditions for employees in all businesses (including manufacturing) engaged in interstate commerce. In its decision, the Court explicitly overruled ''Hammer v. Dagenhart'' (1918) and dismissed arguments that the FLSA invaded powers reserved to the states by the [[Tenth Amendment]], referring to that amendment as “but a truism.”	+	In ''Darby Lumber Company v. United States'' (1941), the [[Supreme Court of the United States\|U.S. Supreme Court]] sustained the constitutionality of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which set minimum wages and other working conditions for employees in all businesses (including manufacturing) engaged in interstate commerce. In its decision, the Court explicitly overruled ''[[Hammer v. Dagenhart]]'' (1918) and dismissed arguments that the FLSA invaded powers reserved to the states by the [[Tenth Amendment]], referring to that amendment as “but a truism.”

	==== Ellis Katz ====		==== Ellis Katz ====

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:31, 4 July 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	In ''Darby Lumber Company v. United States'' (1941), the U.S. Supreme Court sustained the constitutionality of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which set minimum wages and other working conditions for employees in all businesses (including manufacturing) engaged in interstate commerce. In its decision, the Court explicitly overruled ''Hammer v. Dagenhart'' (1918) and dismissed arguments that the FLSA invaded powers reserved to the states by the Tenth Amendment, referring to that amendment as “but a truism.”	+	In ''Darby Lumber Company v. United States'' (1941), the [[Supreme Court of the United States\|U.S. Supreme Court]] sustained the constitutionality of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which set minimum wages and other working conditions for employees in all businesses (including manufacturing) engaged in interstate commerce. In its decision, the Court explicitly overruled ''Hammer v. Dagenhart'' (1918) and dismissed arguments that the FLSA invaded powers reserved to the states by the [[Tenth Amendment]], referring to that amendment as “but a truism.”

	==== Ellis Katz ====		==== Ellis Katz ====

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:42, 28 September 2017
Line 4:		Line 4:

	SEE ALSO: [[Hammer v. Dagenhart]]; [[Tenth Amendment]]		SEE ALSO: [[Hammer v. Dagenhart]]; [[Tenth Amendment]]
		+
		+	[[Category:Supreme Court Cases]]

← Older revision	Revision as of 09:02, 18 October 2019
(No difference)

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 ==== Ellis Katz ====
 SEE ALSO: [[Hammer v. Dagenhart]]; [[Tenth Amendment]]
 [[Category:Supreme Court Cases]]