Hipolite Egg Company v. United States (1911) - Revision history

Admin: Admin moved page Hipolite Egg Company v. United States to Hipolite Egg Company v. United States (1911)

2019-10-21T17:53:53Z

Admin moved page Hipolite Egg Company v. United States to Hipolite Egg Company v. United States (1911)

Admin at 02:41, 5 July 2018

2018-07-05T02:41:03Z

Morgannoel18 at 09:11, 22 October 2017

2017-10-22T09:11:39Z

Admin at 16:49, 28 September 2017

2017-09-28T16:49:47Z

Nicole: Created page with "In ''Hipolite Egg Company v. United States'' (1911), the Court upheld the federal Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906, which prohibited the shipment of adulterated foods in interst..."

2017-01-27T18:51:50Z

Created page with "In ''Hipolite Egg Company v. United States'' (1911), the Court upheld the federal Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906, which prohibited the shipment of adulterated foods in interst..."

New page

In ''Hipolite Egg Company v. United States'' (1911), the Court upheld the federal Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906, which prohibited the shipment of adulterated foods in interstate commerce. In this case, the Hipolite Egg Company was penalized for shipping fifty cans of preserved whole eggs that upon inspection contained 2 percent boric acid and were declared adulterated (impure). Relying on its 1908 precedent, ''Champion v. Ames'', which had upheld a federal ban on the shipment of lottery tickets in interstate commerce, and rejecting claims that the federal law violated the Tenth Amendment, the Court commented that Congress’s control over interstate commerce was “subject to no limitations except those found in the Constitution.”

==== Ellis Katz ====

SEE ALSO: [[Champion v. Ames]]; [[Commerce among the States]]; [[Hammer v. Dagenhart]]; [[Tenth Amendment]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:41, 5 July 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	In ''Hipolite Egg Company v. United States'' (1911), the Court upheld the federal Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906, which prohibited the shipment of adulterated foods in interstate commerce. In this case, the Hipolite Egg Company was penalized for shipping fifty cans of preserved whole eggs that upon inspection contained 2 percent boric acid and were declared adulterated (impure). Relying on its 1908 precedent, ''Champion v. Ames'', which had upheld a federal ban on the shipment of lottery tickets in interstate commerce, and rejecting claims that the federal law violated the Tenth Amendment, the Court commented that Congress’s control over interstate commerce was “subject to no limitations except those found in the Constitution.”	+	In ''Hipolite Egg Company v. United States'' (1911), the [[Supreme Court of the United States\|Court]] upheld the federal Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906, which prohibited the shipment of adulterated foods in interstate commerce. In this case, the Hipolite Egg Company was penalized for shipping fifty cans of preserved whole eggs that upon inspection contained 2 percent boric acid and were declared adulterated (impure). Relying on its 1908 precedent, ''Champion v. Ames'', which had upheld a federal ban on the shipment of lottery tickets in interstate commerce, and rejecting claims that the federal law violated the Tenth Amendment, the Court commented that Congress’s control over interstate commerce was “subject to no limitations except those found in the [[U.S. Constitution\|Constitution]].”

	==== Ellis Katz ====		==== Ellis Katz ====

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:49, 28 September 2017
Line 4:		Line 4:

	SEE ALSO: [[Champion v. Ames]]; [[Commerce among the States]]; [[Hammer v. Dagenhart]]; [[Tenth Amendment]]		SEE ALSO: [[Champion v. Ames]]; [[Commerce among the States]]; [[Hammer v. Dagenhart]]; [[Tenth Amendment]]
		+
		+	[[Category:Supreme Court Cases]]

← Older revision	Revision as of 17:53, 21 October 2019
(No difference)

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 ==== Ellis Katz ====
 SEE ALSO: [[Champion v. Ames]]; [[Commerce among the States]]; [[Hammer v. Dagenhart]]; [[Tenth Amendment]]
 [[Category:Supreme Court Cases]]