Perez v. United States (1971) - Revision history

Admin: Admin moved page Perez v. United States to Perez v. United States (1971)

2019-10-21T19:24:49Z

Admin moved page Perez v. United States to Perez v. United States (1971)

Admin at 18:43, 31 December 2018

2018-12-31T18:43:57Z

Morgannoel18 at 09:09, 28 October 2017

2017-10-28T09:09:46Z

Admin at 20:08, 28 September 2017

2017-09-28T20:08:17Z

Nicole: Created page with "In ''Perez v. United States'' (1971), the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the federal Consumer Credit Protection Act, which, among other things, made “loan sharking” a federal c..."

2017-02-02T14:38:41Z

Created page with "In ''Perez v. United States'' (1971), the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the federal Consumer Credit Protection Act, which, among other things, made “loan sharking” a federal c..."

New page

In ''Perez v. United States'' (1971), the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the federal Consumer Credit Protection Act, which, among other things, made “loan sharking” a federal crime. Rejecting Justice Potter Stewart’s dissenting view that this was a step toward the federalization of the criminal law, the Court held that while Alberto Perez’s activities may have been conducted locally, loan sharking contributed to organized, interstate crime and was therefore within the reach of the federal commerce power.

==== Ellis Katz ====

SEE ALSO: [[Commerce among the States]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:43, 31 December 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	In ''Perez v. United States'' (1971), the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the federal Consumer Credit Protection Act, which, among other things, made “loan sharking” a federal crime. Rejecting Justice Potter Stewart’s dissenting view that this was a step toward the federalization of the criminal law, the Court held that while Alberto Perez’s activities may have been conducted locally, loan sharking contributed to organized, interstate crime and was therefore within the reach of the federal commerce power.	+	In ''Perez v. United States'' (1971), the [[Supreme Court of the United States\|U.S. Supreme Court]] upheld the federal Consumer Credit Protection Act, which, among other things, made “loan sharking” a federal crime. Rejecting Justice Potter Stewart’s dissenting view that this was a step toward the federalization of the criminal law, the Court held that while Alberto Perez’s activities may have been conducted locally, loan sharking contributed to organized, interstate crime and was therefore within the reach of the federal [[Commerce among the States\|commerce]] power.

	==== Ellis Katz ====		==== Ellis Katz ====

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:08, 28 September 2017
Line 4:		Line 4:

	SEE ALSO: [[Commerce among the States]]		SEE ALSO: [[Commerce among the States]]
		+
		+	[[Category:Supreme Court Cases]]

← Older revision	Revision as of 19:24, 21 October 2019
(No difference)

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 ==== Ellis Katz ====
 SEE ALSO: [[Commerce among the States]]
 [[Category:Supreme Court Cases]]