Shreveport Rate Case - Revision history

Admin at 19:34, 2 May 2019

2019-05-02T19:34:07Z

Morgannoel18 at 08:49, 28 October 2017

2017-10-28T08:49:16Z

Nicole: Created page with "''The Shreveport Rate Case'' (1914)—officially known as ''Houston, East and West Texas Railway v. United States''—permitted the Interstate Commerce Commission to control '..."

2017-02-03T18:23:52Z

Created page with "''The Shreveport Rate Case'' (1914)—officially known as ''Houston, East and West Texas Railway v. United States''—permitted the Interstate Commerce Commission to control '..."

New page

''The Shreveport Rate Case'' (1914)—officially known as ''Houston, East and West Texas Railway v. United States''—permitted the Interstate Commerce Commission to control ''intrastate'' railway rates if they bore “a close and substantial relation to interstate traffic.” This broad doctrine of the reach of federal authority under the Commerce Clause was later applied to manufacturing and other economic activities by the Court in ''National Labor Relations Board v. Jones and Laughlin Steel Corporation'' (1937) and continues to dominate thinking about the Commerce Clause.

==== Ellis Katz ====

SEE ALSO: [[Commerce among the States]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:34, 2 May 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	''The Shreveport Rate Case'' (1914)—officially known as ''Houston, East and West Texas Railway v. United States''—permitted the Interstate Commerce Commission to control ''intrastate'' railway rates if they bore “a close and substantial relation to interstate traffic.” This broad doctrine of the reach of federal authority under the Commerce Clause was later applied to manufacturing and other economic activities by the Court in ''National Labor Relations Board v. Jones and Laughlin Steel Corporation'' (1937) and continues to dominate thinking about the Commerce Clause.	+	''The Shreveport Rate Case'' (1914)—officially known as ''Houston, East and West Texas Railway v. United States''—permitted the [[Interstate Commerce]] Commission to control ''intrastate'' railway rates if they bore “a close and substantial relation to interstate traffic.” This broad doctrine of the reach of federal authority under the Commerce Clause was later applied to manufacturing and other economic activities by the Court in ''[[National Labor Relations Board v. Jones and Laughlin Steel Corporation]]'' (1937) and continues to dominate thinking about the Commerce Clause.

	==== Ellis Katz ====		==== Ellis Katz ====

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:49, 28 October 2017
Line 2:		Line 2:

	==== Ellis Katz ====		==== Ellis Katz ====
		+
		+	Last Updated: 2006

	SEE ALSO: [[Commerce among the States]]		SEE ALSO: [[Commerce among the States]]