Southern Railway Company v. Reid (1912) - Revision history

Admin: Admin moved page Southern Railway Company v. Reid to Southern Railway Company v. Reid (1912)

2019-10-21T19:44:28Z

Admin moved page Southern Railway Company v. Reid to Southern Railway Company v. Reid (1912)

Admin at 22:21, 3 May 2019

2019-05-03T22:21:28Z

Morgannoel18 at 08:46, 28 October 2017

2017-10-28T08:46:05Z

Admin at 20:15, 28 September 2017

2017-09-28T20:15:47Z

Nicole: Created page with "''Southern Railway Company v. Reid'' (1912) is an early preemption case in which the Supreme Court invalidated a North Carolina statute requiring common carriers to transport..."

2017-02-03T19:18:37Z

Created page with "''Southern Railway Company v. Reid'' (1912) is an early preemption case in which the Supreme Court invalidated a North Carolina statute requiring common carriers to transport..."

New page

''Southern Railway Company v. Reid'' (1912) is an early preemption case in which the Supreme Court invalidated a North Carolina statute requiring common carriers to transport freight to out-of-state locations as soon as it was received. Speaking for the Court, Justice McKenna said that between federal and state, one must be paramount, and when it speaks the other must remain silent, thus preempting that subject. Because the federal government had enacted the Hepburn Act of 1906, forbidding interstate shipment of goods until rates had been filed and published, the federal government had “occupied the field,” leaving no room for state regulation of the same subject matter.

==== Robert W. Langran ====

SEE ALSO: [[Burbank v. Lockheed Air Terminal]]; [[Commerce among the States]]; [[Hines v. Davidowitz]]; [[Pennsylvania v. Nelson]]; [[Preemption]]; [[Supremacy Clause: Article VI, Clause 2]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:21, 3 May 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	''Southern Railway Company v. Reid'' (1912) is an early preemption case in which the Supreme Court invalidated a North Carolina statute requiring common carriers to transport freight to out-of-state locations as soon as it was received. Speaking for the Court, Justice McKenna said that between federal and state, one must be paramount, and when it speaks the other must remain silent, thus preempting that subject. Because the federal government had enacted the Hepburn Act of 1906, forbidding interstate shipment of goods until rates had been filed and published, the federal government had “occupied the field,” leaving no room for state regulation of the same subject matter.	+	''Southern Railway Company v. Reid'' (1912) is an early preemption case in which the [[U.S. Supreme Court\|Supreme Court]] invalidated a North Carolina statute requiring common carriers to transport freight to out-of-state locations as soon as it was received. Speaking for the Court, Justice McKenna said that between federal and state, one must be paramount, and when it speaks the other must remain silent, thus preempting that subject. Because the federal government had enacted the Hepburn Act of 1906, forbidding interstate shipment of goods until rates had been filed and published, the federal government had “occupied the field,” leaving no room for state regulation of the same subject matter.

	==== Robert W. Langran ====		==== Robert W. Langran ====

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:15, 28 September 2017
Line 4:		Line 4:

	SEE ALSO: [[Burbank v. Lockheed Air Terminal]]; [[Commerce among the States]]; [[Hines v. Davidowitz]]; [[Pennsylvania v. Nelson]]; [[Preemption]]; [[Supremacy Clause: Article VI, Clause 2]]		SEE ALSO: [[Burbank v. Lockheed Air Terminal]]; [[Commerce among the States]]; [[Hines v. Davidowitz]]; [[Pennsylvania v. Nelson]]; [[Preemption]]; [[Supremacy Clause: Article VI, Clause 2]]
		+
		+	[[Category:Supreme Court Cases]]

← Older revision	Revision as of 19:44, 21 October 2019
(No difference)

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 ==== Robert W. Langran ====
 SEE ALSO: [[Burbank v. Lockheed Air Terminal]]; [[Commerce among the States]]; [[Hines v. Davidowitz]]; [[Pennsylvania v. Nelson]]; [[Preemption]]; [[Supremacy Clause: Article VI, Clause 2]]
 [[Category:Supreme Court Cases]]