Difference between revisions of "Darby Lumber Company v. United States (1941)"
From Federalism in America
Morgannoel18 (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==== Ellis Katz ==== | ==== Ellis Katz ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Last updated: 2006 | ||
SEE ALSO: [[Hammer v. Dagenhart]]; [[Tenth Amendment]] | SEE ALSO: [[Hammer v. Dagenhart]]; [[Tenth Amendment]] | ||
[[Category:Supreme Court Cases]] | [[Category:Supreme Court Cases]] | ||
Revision as of 08:18, 22 October 2017
In Darby Lumber Company v. United States (1941), the U.S. Supreme Court sustained the constitutionality of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which set minimum wages and other working conditions for employees in all businesses (including manufacturing) engaged in interstate commerce. In its decision, the Court explicitly overruled Hammer v. Dagenhart (1918) and dismissed arguments that the FLSA invaded powers reserved to the states by the Tenth Amendment, referring to that amendment as “but a truism.”
Ellis Katz
Last updated: 2006
SEE ALSO: Hammer v. Dagenhart; Tenth Amendment