Difference between revisions of "Southern Railway Company v. Reid (1912)"
Morgannoel18 (talk | contribs) |
m (Admin moved page Southern Railway Company v. Reid to Southern Railway Company v. Reid (1912)) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | ''Southern Railway Company v. Reid'' (1912) is an early preemption case in which the Supreme Court invalidated a North Carolina statute requiring common carriers to transport freight to out-of-state locations as soon as it was received. Speaking for the Court, Justice McKenna said that between federal and state, one must be paramount, and when it speaks the other must remain silent, thus preempting that subject. Because the federal government had enacted the Hepburn Act of 1906, forbidding interstate shipment of goods until rates had been filed and published, the federal government had “occupied the field,” leaving no room for state regulation of the same subject matter. | + | ''Southern Railway Company v. Reid'' (1912) is an early preemption case in which the [[U.S. Supreme Court|Supreme Court]] invalidated a North Carolina statute requiring common carriers to transport freight to out-of-state locations as soon as it was received. Speaking for the Court, Justice McKenna said that between federal and state, one must be paramount, and when it speaks the other must remain silent, thus preempting that subject. Because the federal government had enacted the Hepburn Act of 1906, forbidding interstate shipment of goods until rates had been filed and published, the federal government had “occupied the field,” leaving no room for state regulation of the same subject matter. |
==== Robert W. Langran ==== | ==== Robert W. Langran ==== | ||
Latest revision as of 19:44, 21 October 2019
Southern Railway Company v. Reid (1912) is an early preemption case in which the Supreme Court invalidated a North Carolina statute requiring common carriers to transport freight to out-of-state locations as soon as it was received. Speaking for the Court, Justice McKenna said that between federal and state, one must be paramount, and when it speaks the other must remain silent, thus preempting that subject. Because the federal government had enacted the Hepburn Act of 1906, forbidding interstate shipment of goods until rates had been filed and published, the federal government had “occupied the field,” leaving no room for state regulation of the same subject matter.
Robert W. Langran
Last Updated: 2006
SEE ALSO: Burbank v. Lockheed Air Terminal; Commerce among the States; Hines v. Davidowitz; Pennsylvania v. Nelson; Preemption; Supremacy Clause: Article VI, Clause 2