Search results

Create the page "United States v. Printz" on this wiki! See also the search results found.

Page title matches

• Printz v. United States (1997)
  In ''Printz v. United States'' (1997), the [[Supreme Court of the United States|U.S. Supreme Court]] struck down provisions of the federal Brady Handgun Vi Shortly after the Brady Bill was enacted, two local sheriffs—Jay Printz from Ravalli County, Montana, and Richard Mack of Graham County, Arizona—
  7 KB (1,097 words) - 19:30, 21 October 2019
• Printz v. United States
  #REDIRECT [[Printz v. United States (1997)]]
  44 bytes (5 words) - 19:30, 21 October 2019

Page text matches

• Alphabetical List of Entries
  * [[Admission of New States]] * [[Arizona v. United States (2012)]]
  16 KB (1,658 words) - 19:41, 23 July 2022
• Commerce among the States
  ...cal System of the United States, written on the eve of the Convention, the states were injuring their commerce with each other as well as foreign commerce by ...tention was on foreign trade, with little discussion of commerce among the states.
  32 KB (5,040 words) - 02:12, 18 June 2019
• Criminal Justice
  The United States has an array of criminal justice systems: one at the federal level, fifty a ...e states and the federal government permit government executions. Nineteen states and the District of Columbia do not. Thus, a person convicted of first-degr
  5 KB (798 words) - 22:13, 3 May 2018
• Guarantee Clause
  ...on 4, the [[U.S. Constitution|Constitution]] declares that “[t]he United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Governmen ...romises concretely describe certain types of destabilizing violence within states that the federal government pledges to prevent. The first, invasion, impose
  16 KB (2,271 words) - 01:54, 5 July 2018
• Necessary and Proper Clause
  ...by this [[U.S. Constitution|Constitution]] in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.” When it was adopted, this form ...l other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.''
  9 KB (1,350 words) - 22:06, 26 November 2018
• New York v. United States (1992)
  ...Act of 1985 for unconstitutionally interfering with powers reserved to the states under the [[Tenth Amendment]]. Although the case received relatively little ...Congress|Congress]] approved a total of nine regional compacts covering 42 states. New York however, was not a party to any of those compacts.
  4 KB (619 words) - 19:18, 21 October 2019
• Printz v. United States (1997)
  In ''Printz v. United States'' (1997), the [[Supreme Court of the United States|U.S. Supreme Court]] struck down provisions of the federal Brady Handgun Vi Shortly after the Brady Bill was enacted, two local sheriffs—Jay Printz from Ravalli County, Montana, and Richard Mack of Graham County, Arizona—
  7 KB (1,097 words) - 19:30, 21 October 2019
• Reserved Powers
  ...''[[National League of Cities v. Usery]]'' (1976) and ''[[Printz v. United States]]'' (1992). ...g the States]]; [[National League of Cities v. Usery]]; [[Printz v. United States]]; [[Tenth Amendment]]
  1 KB (170 words) - 20:44, 30 April 2019
• Scalia, Antonin
  ...has produced unique approaches to [[preemption]] and [[Commerce among the States|Commerce Clause]] doctrines, and he has endeavored to protect the jurisdict ...f other justices (e.g., ''[[United States v. Lopez]]'' 1995 and ''[[United States v. Morrison]]'' 2000) that held the federal government interfered with the
  6 KB (840 words) - 01:19, 1 May 2019
• State Government
  ...t]]—any power not mentioned in the Constitution is “reserved” to the states. ...propriate division of economic and political powers. In 1814, northeastern states met at the Hartford Convention, in part, to demand less federal interferenc
  7 KB (1,076 words) - 20:08, 6 May 2019
• Supreme Court of the United States
  ...formity and supremacy of federal law against centrifugal tendencies in the states, while also exerting some degree of check on the centralizing impulses of t ...Neil M. Gorsuch. Collection, Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States. Photographed by Frantz Jantzen]]
  18 KB (2,757 words) - 22:09, 3 May 2018
• Tenth Amendment
  ...nment would grow in large proportions until it eventually swallowed up the states. While the framers of the Constitution felt that the type of statement made ...the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.''
  17 KB (2,583 words) - 20:37, 10 May 2019
• U.S. Supreme Court
  ...formity and supremacy of federal law against centrifugal tendencies in the states, while also exerting some degree of check on the centralizing impulses of t [[File:Supreme Court of the United States.png|thumb|Members of the U.S. Supreme Court 2004–5. Back row (left to rig
  18 KB (2,746 words) - 03:42, 10 December 2017
• United States v. Lopez (1995)
  In ''United States v. Lopez'' (1995), the [[Supreme Court of the United States|U.S. Supreme Court]] held that the federal “Gun-Free School Zones Act” ...Congress’s Article I enumerated powers, and therefore it must be left to states and localities to regulate. Joining Rehnquist in the majority were Justices
  5 KB (765 words) - 21:06, 21 October 2019
• Printz v. United States
  #REDIRECT [[Printz v. United States (1997)]]
  44 bytes (5 words) - 19:30, 21 October 2019