Search results

Create the page "Burger, Warren" on this wiki! See also the search results found.

Page title matches

• Burger, Warren Earl
  ...g to appoint “strict constructionists” to the Supreme Court, nominated Burger to be chief justice. He was confirmed by the Senate by a vote of 74–3. ...ome areas, he led the Court far beyond what the Warren Court had done. The Burger Court, for example, upheld busing as a remedy for school segregation, gave
  3 KB (481 words) - 00:26, 17 July 2018

Page text matches

• Alphabetical List of Entries
  * [[Burger, Warren Earl]] * [[Charles River Bridge Company v. Warren Bridge Company (1837)]]
  16 KB (1,658 words) - 19:41, 23 July 2022
• Brennan, William J., Jr.
  ...bstantive questions of individual rights. But in the [[Burger, Warren Earl|Burger]] Court, Brennan faced a new breed of federalism cases in which the allocat
  5 KB (825 words) - 20:21, 16 July 2018
• Burger, Warren Earl
  ...g to appoint “strict constructionists” to the Supreme Court, nominated Burger to be chief justice. He was confirmed by the Senate by a vote of 74–3. ...ome areas, he led the Court far beyond what the Warren Court had done. The Burger Court, for example, upheld busing as a remedy for school segregation, gave
  3 KB (481 words) - 00:26, 17 July 2018
• Exclusionary Rule
  ...The Supreme Court, especially under the leadership of Chief Justice Warren Burger but also under his successor, [[Rehnquist, William|William Rehnquist]], fas SEE ALSO: [[Burger, Warren Earl]]; [[Fourteenth Amendment]]; [[Incorporation (Nationalization) of the
  7 KB (1,054 words) - 23:37, 6 September 2018
• Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
  ''Mapp v. Ohio'' (1961) is the first of a series of cases in which the Warren Court incorporated various procedural aspects of the [[Bill of Rights]] to SEE ALSO: [[Burger, Warren Earl]]; [[Exclusionary Rule]]; [[Fourteenth Amendment]]; [[Incorporation (N
  3 KB (412 words) - 18:09, 21 October 2019
• State Constitutions
  ...Rehnquist, William|Rehnquist]] Courts generally proved less eager than the Warren Court to issue expansive interpretations of federal [[Bill of Rights|bill o
  16 KB (2,484 words) - 19:47, 6 May 2019
• Supreme Court of the United States
  ...d it was resisted primarily in the name of “states’ rights.” And the Warren Court’s string of landmark criminal procedure and habeas corpus rulings e ...thority or extensive individual rights enforceable against the states. The Burger Court’s most visible effort to restrict federal power—its ruling in ''N
  18 KB (2,757 words) - 22:09, 3 May 2018
• U.S. Supreme Court
  ...d it was resisted primarily in the name of “states’ rights.” And the Warren Court’s string of landmark criminal procedure and habeas corpus rulings e ...thority or extensive individual rights enforceable against the states. The Burger Court’s most visible effort to restrict federal power—its ruling in ''N
  18 KB (2,746 words) - 03:42, 10 December 2017
• State Constitutional Rights Federalism
  ...[[Mapp v. Ohio (1961)]], [[Miranda v. Arizona (1966)]], or other landmark Warren Court rulings. Nor did the Supreme Court under subsequent chief justices. N ...he prospect of extending rights protections beyond those recognized by the Warren Court.
  18 KB (2,680 words) - 01:55, 5 September 2020