Search results

Jump to: navigation, search
  • ...s interest in the life of the fetus and the health of the woman. While the Court undeniably reinforced its support of the constitutional core of  ''Roe'' ...ened. Further, a jurisprudential conflict exists as to whether the Supreme Court via  ''Roe''  and its progeny violates the tenets of [[federalism]], an
    22 KB (3,400 words) - 19:45, 6 July 2018
  • * [[Original Jurisdiction of Supreme Court]] * [[Roberts Court]]
    16 KB (1,658 words) - 19:41, 23 July 2022
  • ...speech and debate in Congress shall not be impeached or questioned in any court or place out of Congress, and the members of Congress shall be protected in ...d establishing courts for receiving and determining finally appeals in all cases of captures, provided that no member of Congress shall be appointed a judge
    20 KB (3,426 words) - 22:50, 4 October 2021
  • ===Supreme Court Cases=== category = Supreme Court Cases
    2 KB (182 words) - 23:25, 28 January 2022
  • ...appeal was taken to the [[Supreme Court of the United States|U.S. Supreme Court]]. ...nt]]. Relying largely on the ''Twining'' case, the majority of the Supreme Court affirmed Dewey Adamson’s conviction and rejected the argument of his coun
    4 KB (610 words) - 22:12, 16 October 2019
  • ...s, known as [[Black Codes]], intended to regulate the freedmen and in many cases reduce them to a state of quasi-slavery. These laws imposed many special di ...se Cases'' of 1873. In these cases, Justice Samuel Miller, writing for the Court majority, adhered to the minimal change view; in dissent Justice Stephen Fi
    17 KB (2,624 words) - 23:17, 4 July 2018
  • ..., moves were made by the [[Supreme Court of the United States|U.S. Supreme Court]] and Congress to move tribal governments to a less prominent position rela ...s relative to state governments was established in ''Worcester''. Here the Court established that state law has no force within Indian borders and that all
    22 KB (3,370 words) - 23:12, 16 September 2021
  • ...er v. Dagenhart'' (1918), the [[Supreme Court of the United States|Supreme Court]] invalidated the federal Keating-Owen Child Labor Act, which had forbidden Speaking for the Court, Chief Justice William Howard Taft found that the present law, like its pre
    2 KB (243 words) - 22:13, 16 October 2019
  • ...[Fourteenth Amendment]] to the [[U.S. Constitution]]. The federal district court applied the precedent from ''[[Colegrove v. Green]]'' (1946) and dismissed ...ned, thus opening the window for “judicial resolution of reapportionment cases.” However, this decision was most significant because it established that
    4 KB (515 words) - 22:11, 16 October 2019
  • ...itality of the Nation as a single entity.” Elk hunting, according to the Court, does not fit into that category. The decision is also interesting because [[Category:Supreme Court Cases]]
    1 KB (200 words) - 05:55, 18 October 2019
  • In ''South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., et al.'' (2018), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] ruled that a state can require sellers with no physical presence in the s ...Court. In a five-to-four decision written by Justice Anthony Kennedy, the Court set aside the physical-presence rule required by ''Bellas Hess'' and ''Quil
    7 KB (1,078 words) - 19:43, 21 October 2019
  • ...appealed his case to the [[Supreme Court of the United States|U.S. Supreme Court]]. ...f Baltimore or the State of Maryland, Barron’s case was dismissed by the Court for lack of jurisdiction.
    3 KB (541 words) - 08:25, 18 October 2019
  • [[Category:Supreme Court Cases]]
    82 bytes (11 words) - 21:54, 21 October 2019
  • ...us crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual serv ...served, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.''
    14 KB (2,226 words) - 19:26, 13 July 2018
  • ...data showing the bad effects on women of working too many hours. When the Court unanimously upheld the law, it paid tribute to Brandeis’s arguments and, ...was in cases involving freedom of speech, and he often dissented in those cases along with Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. The issue in contention was Ho
    4 KB (583 words) - 23:59, 2 July 2018
  • ...rennan Jr. served on the [[Supreme Court of the United States|U.S. Supreme Court]] from 1956 to 1990, and during his tenure he influenced [[federalism]] in When Brennan joined the Court, he quickly picked up the mantle of incorporation—the effort to make the
    5 KB (825 words) - 20:21, 16 July 2018
  • ...oreclosed mortgages. The [[Supreme Court of the United States|U.S. Supreme Court]], speaking through Chief Justice [[Taney, Roger Brooke|Roger Brooke Taney] ...Bronson v. Kinzie,” in ''Landmark Decisions of the United States Supreme Court'' (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2008), 68–69.
    2 KB (253 words) - 08:27, 18 October 2019
  • ...d by new Chief Justice Earl Warren and presaged a more activist era in the Court’s history. ...ars, park benches, water fountains, restrooms, and bibles for witnesses in court. Southern (and other) states also maintained segregated public schools.
    15 KB (2,308 words) - 08:29, 18 October 2019
  • ...nted noise. A closely divided [[Supreme Court of the United States|Supreme Court]] held the ordinance invalid because Congress had preempted state and local
    2 KB (299 words) - 08:31, 18 October 2019
  • ...resident promising to appoint “strict constructionists” to the Supreme Court, nominated Burger to be chief justice. He was confirmed by the Senate by a ...as, he led the Court far beyond what the Warren Court had done. The Burger Court, for example, upheld busing as a remedy for school segregation, gave new me
    3 KB (481 words) - 00:26, 17 July 2018
  • ...federal statutes can supersede state election laws and decisions of state supreme courts interpreting those state laws. ...es. After a series of decisions by lower state courts, the Florida Supreme Court ruled that the selective recounts should continue in the presidential race,
    6 KB (892 words) - 08:33, 18 October 2019
  • [[Category:Supreme Court Cases]]
    101 bytes (12 words) - 18:00, 23 October 2019
  • ...cal failure could be forced to endure another attempted electrocution. The Court, noting that “[a]ccidents happen for which no man is to blame,” permitt ...nition of the right to competent counsel in state capital proceedings. The Court reversed another conviction obtained in the ''Scottsboro'' case because it
    20 KB (3,036 words) - 00:49, 17 July 2018
  • ...rative federalism]]. In this latter conception, the national government is supreme and is not forbidden from using its powers to affect the constitutional spa ...anklin Roosevelt’s]] court-packing scheme. The following year, 1937, the Court changed directions and supported the national supremacy view of federalism.
    4 KB (551 words) - 08:37, 18 October 2019
  • ...on v. Ames'' (1903), the [[Supreme Court of the United States|U.S. Supreme Court]] sustained a federal statute that made it illegal to transport lottery tic In later cases, the Court upheld the power of Congress to enact the Pure Food and Drug Act (''[[Hipol
    1 KB (218 words) - 08:39, 18 October 2019
  • ...ohn|John Marshall]], the [[Supreme Court of the United States|U.S. Supreme Court]] interpreted the Contract Clause broadly to include public charters as wel [[Category:Supreme Court Cases]]
    2 KB (314 words) - 08:42, 18 October 2019
  • ...and specifies that the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction in cases in which a state shall be a party. ...however, disagreed with Hamilton and held that it had jurisdiction in such cases whether or not the state had given its consent to be sued. The decision rai
    2 KB (285 words) - 08:44, 18 October 2019
  • ...ho had dissented strongly two years before in ''Braunfeld'', wrote for the Court in ''Sherbert v. Verner''. Here it was held that government could refuse an ...terest test. This set the stage for the collision between Congress and the Court in ''Flores''.
    4 KB (574 words) - 08:46, 18 October 2019
  • ...rom the violation of the provisions of the act reviewable by the [[Supreme Court of the United States]]. In 1883, the Supreme Court declared the 1875 Act unconstitutional on the ground that, to cite part of
    4 KB (518 words) - 02:28, 25 July 2018
  • ...tution|Constitution]], which permits the suspension of the writ “when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.” Taney argued ...e upon which he justified the imposition of martial law and the particular cases where he exercised it, Lincoln’s actions were more restrained than the se
    20 KB (2,997 words) - 03:40, 25 July 2018
  • ...ictional point, and that the Supreme Court could not adjudicate appeals in cases when a state was a party. Such a practice, in effect, would immunize state ...itizens of Maryland who were convicted of a criminal offense by a Virginia court. The constitutional ban on extending “the Judicial power of the United St
    3 KB (525 words) - 08:48, 18 October 2019
  • [[Category:Supreme Court Cases]]
    100 bytes (12 words) - 18:03, 23 October 2019
  • [[Category:Supreme Court Cases]]
    1 KB (154 words) - 08:51, 18 October 2019
  • ...or limits on its branches, allowing considerable room for disagreement and Court interpretations over the centuries of this very important power. In additio ...te commerce among the states. In large part, these issues still occupy the Court.
    32 KB (5,040 words) - 02:12, 18 June 2019
  • ...on|Constitution]], has not caused the [[Supreme Court of the United States|Court]] to deal with the definitional problems, controversy, or direct conflict w ...mant foreign commerce power, like its domestic counterpart, both drew upon cases involving foreign commerce, and continued to be invoked with similar result
    9 KB (1,337 words) - 02:52, 12 July 2018
  • ...rincipal vehicle by which the [[Supreme Court of the United States|Supreme Court]] vindicated the rights of property owners against state abridgement. A cha ...ntracts, including state tax exemptions to business. More importantly, the Court in ''[[Dartmouth College v. Woodward]]'' (1819) concluded that the grant of
    9 KB (1,361 words) - 04:28, 8 August 2018
  • ...a to hire a local pilot. States may regulate interstate commerce, said the Court in an opinion authored by Justice Benjamin Curtis, as long as there is no p ...ople. The congressional power to regulate interstate commerce, however, is supreme when exercised and all conflicting state laws are void. Marshall, however,
    9 KB (1,374 words) - 08:53, 18 October 2019
  • ...osby'' case (2000) represents perhaps the [[Rehnquist, William|Rehnquist]] Court’s most important encounter with the intersection between [[federalism]], ...by Japan and the European Union before the World Trade Organization), the Court found that the state law thwarted Congress’s intent for the nation to spe
    6 KB (888 words) - 08:57, 18 October 2019
  • ...ment of Health'' (1990) was a [[Supreme Court of the United States|Supreme Court]] case concerning the so-called right to die. Nancy Cruzan was a 32-year-ol [[Category:Supreme Court Cases]]
    1 KB (235 words) - 09:00, 18 October 2019
  • ...luding manufacturing) engaged in interstate commerce. In its decision, the Court explicitly overruled ''[[Hammer v. Dagenhart]]'' (1918) and dismissed argum [[Category:Supreme Court Cases]]
    708 bytes (99 words) - 09:02, 18 October 2019
  • [[Category:Supreme Court Cases]]
    1 KB (190 words) - 09:03, 18 October 2019
  • [[Category:Supreme Court Cases]]
    101 bytes (12 words) - 18:07, 23 October 2019
  • ...action. For example, the 1877 [[Supreme Court of the United States|Supreme Court]] case ''Munn v. Illinois'' gave states the power to regulate prices of fir ...its case (''United States v. Microsoft Corporation''). Recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions, such as ''North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. FTC'
    8 KB (1,113 words) - 05:45, 17 August 2018
  • ...es is sometimes described as “alienage jurisdiction,” although federal court power over both of these two categories falls under the umbrella term “di ...use state courts would be prejudiced against out-of-state parties. Federal court jurisdiction was thought necessary to provide a neutral, impartial forum fo
    4 KB (652 words) - 05:53, 17 August 2018
  • ...se]] Law (1820), slavery was forbidden. He sued for his freedom in federal court, but Taney ruled that since slavery is expressly affirmed in the Constituti [[Category:Supreme Court Cases]]
    2 KB (363 words) - 09:06, 18 October 2019
  • ...]] dealt with conflicts between the national and state governments in many cases, including ''[[McCulloch v. Maryland]]'' (1819), ''[[Gibbons v. Ogden]]'' ( ...vernments faced two obstacles to controlling large firms: first, a Supreme Court that favored laissez-faire economic theory over state regulatory powers; an
    8 KB (1,180 words) - 06:03, 17 August 2018
  • [[Category:Supreme Court Cases]]
    101 bytes (12 words) - 18:09, 23 October 2019
  • ...not an overriding reason to curtail a right as fundamental as voting. The Court pointed out that [[U.S. Congress|Congress]] in the 1970 [[Voting Rights Act [[Category:Supreme Court Cases]]
    1 KB (219 words) - 09:07, 18 October 2019
  • ...to California and becoming a drain on the state’s resources. A unanimous Court, speaking through Justice James Byrnes, invalidated the law, calling it an [[Category:Supreme Court Cases]]
    1 KB (172 words) - 20:03, 18 October 2019
  • ...00 presidential election, the [[Supreme Court of the United States|Supreme Court]] ruled that the Equal Protection Clause limits the kinds of procedures tha ...significant influence on the way congressional districts, and even in many cases state legislative districts, are drawn by their state legislatures.
    8 KB (1,107 words) - 19:04, 27 August 2018

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)