Difference between revisions of "Hines v. Davidowitz (1941)"
From Federalism in America
(Created page with "In ''Hines v. Davidowitz'' (1941), the U.S. Supreme Court invalidated a Pennsylvania law requiring aliens to register with state authorities because the federal Alien Registra...") |
m (Admin moved page Hines v. Davidowitz to Hines v. Davidowitz (1941)) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | In ''Hines v. Davidowitz'' (1941), the U.S. Supreme Court invalidated a Pennsylvania law requiring aliens to register with state authorities because the federal Alien Registration Act of 1940, which required aliens to register with federal authorities, had preempted the field. While the federal law did not explicitly preclude state regulation, the Court held that preemption was implied because of the paramount federal interest in the regulation of resident aliens. | + | In ''Hines v. Davidowitz'' (1941), the [[Supreme Court of the United States|U.S. Supreme Court]] invalidated a Pennsylvania law requiring aliens to register with state authorities because the federal Alien Registration Act of 1940, which required aliens to register with federal authorities, had preempted the field. While the federal law did not explicitly preclude state regulation, the Court held that preemption was implied because of the paramount federal interest in the regulation of resident aliens. |
==== Robert W. Langran ==== | ==== Robert W. Langran ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Last updated: 2006 | ||
SEE ALSO: [[Pennsylvania v. Nelson]]; [[Preemption]] | SEE ALSO: [[Pennsylvania v. Nelson]]; [[Preemption]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Supreme Court Cases]] | ||
Latest revision as of 21:09, 18 October 2019
In Hines v. Davidowitz (1941), the U.S. Supreme Court invalidated a Pennsylvania law requiring aliens to register with state authorities because the federal Alien Registration Act of 1940, which required aliens to register with federal authorities, had preempted the field. While the federal law did not explicitly preclude state regulation, the Court held that preemption was implied because of the paramount federal interest in the regulation of resident aliens.
Robert W. Langran
Last updated: 2006
SEE ALSO: Pennsylvania v. Nelson; Preemption