Difference between revisions of "United States Trust Company v. New Jersey (1977)"
m (Admin moved page United States Trust Company v. New Jersey to United States Trust Company v. New Jersey (1977)) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | In 1962, the States of New Jersey and New York entered into an agreement that dedicated the tolls collected by the Port Authority to the repayment of bonds issued by the Authority. However, when a gasoline shortage hit the United States in the | + | In 1962, the States of New Jersey and New York entered into an agreement that dedicated the tolls collected by the Port Authority to the repayment of bonds issued by the Authority. However, when a gasoline shortage hit the United States in the 1970's, the legislatures of the 2 states in 1974 retroactively repealed the agreement in order to provide greater revenue for mass transit. The United States Trust Company, which was a trustee for and holder of Authority bonds, brought suit challenging the repeal. In 1977, the [[Supreme Court of the United States|U.S. Supreme Court]] struck down the repeal as an unconstitutional impairment of a contract. The decision in ''United States Trust Company v. New Jersey'' marks a rare use of the [[Contract Clause]] to invalidate state action since ''[[Home Building and Loan v. Blaisdell]]'' was decided in 1934. |
==== Robert W. Langran ==== | ==== Robert W. Langran ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Last Updated: 2006 | ||
SEE ALSO: [[Contract Clause]]; [[Dartmouth College v. Woodward]]; [[Fletcher v. Peck]]; [[Home Building and Loan v. Blaisdell]]; [[Stone v. Mississippi]] | SEE ALSO: [[Contract Clause]]; [[Dartmouth College v. Woodward]]; [[Fletcher v. Peck]]; [[Home Building and Loan v. Blaisdell]]; [[Stone v. Mississippi]] | ||
[[Category:Supreme Court Cases]] | [[Category:Supreme Court Cases]] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:51, 21 October 2019
In 1962, the States of New Jersey and New York entered into an agreement that dedicated the tolls collected by the Port Authority to the repayment of bonds issued by the Authority. However, when a gasoline shortage hit the United States in the 1970's, the legislatures of the 2 states in 1974 retroactively repealed the agreement in order to provide greater revenue for mass transit. The United States Trust Company, which was a trustee for and holder of Authority bonds, brought suit challenging the repeal. In 1977, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the repeal as an unconstitutional impairment of a contract. The decision in United States Trust Company v. New Jersey marks a rare use of the Contract Clause to invalidate state action since Home Building and Loan v. Blaisdell was decided in 1934.
Robert W. Langran
Last Updated: 2006
SEE ALSO: Contract Clause; Dartmouth College v. Woodward; Fletcher v. Peck; Home Building and Loan v. Blaisdell; Stone v. Mississippi